Levered Risk Parity
Specification
Policy
| Rebalancing Interval | Quarterly |
|---|---|
| Weights Algorithm | Equal Risk Contribution |
| Weights Algorithm Look-back | 3 Years |
| Weights Updating Interval | Quarterly |
Benchmark
| Simple 60/40 |
Description
Levered Risk Parity is likely too high-octane to hold as a total portfolio solution since this much leverage seems to create undue variance drag. However, it could be an interesting portfolio to embed as a sleeve in another portfolio. The “equal weight” construction showcases how a dynamic weighting algorithm can adapt allocation over time, allowing each asset class to leave an impact on the portfolio as a whole. Adding a risk-mitigating sleeve may be an interesting paring for this portfolio.
Policy Report
Backtest Report
From to (7y 1m 23d)
Returns (annualized)
| Portfolio | 6.31% |
| Benchmark | 6.51% |
Risk (annualized)
| Portfolio | 20.32% |
| Benchmark | 11.38% |
Sharpe (annualized)
| Portfolio | 0.29 |
| Benchmark | 0.41 |
Excess Return (annualized)
| -0.20% |
Tracking Error (annualized)
| 16.03% |
Information Ratio
| -0.01 |
| Statistic | Portfolio | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Downside Volatility | 21.74% | 12.27% |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.27 | 0.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 13.75 | 15.14 |
| Max Drawdown | 42.24% | 22.16% |
| VaR (99% Confidence) | $-4,726 | $-2,646 |
| VaR (99.9% Confidence) | $-6,278 | $-3,515 |
| Beta to Benchmark | 1.10 | N/A |
Value at Risk (VaR) is calculated off a $10,000 portfolio value.
Growth Charts
Historical Weights
Return Distribution
Excess Kurtosis
| 7.47 |
Skew
| -0.49 |
Data Table
| Factor | Portfolio | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Duration Factor | 2.1350 | 2.1350 |
| Inflation Factor | 0.7013 | 0.7013 |
| Market Factor | 0.7980 | 0.7980 |
| Size Factor | -0.0572 | -0.0572 |
| Style Factor | 0.0893 | 0.0893 |
| U.S. Tilt (Non U.S.) | -0.1817 | -0.1817 |
| Yield Curve Factor | 0.3176 | 0.3176 |
Adjusted R2
| Portfolio | 0.84 |
| Benchmark | 0.99 |
Intercept
| Portfolio | -0.00 |
| Benchmark | 0.00 |