Levered Risk Parity
Portfolio Specification
Policy
Rebalancing Interval | Quarterly |
---|---|
Weights Algorithm | Equal Risk Contribution |
Weights Algorithm Look-back | 3 Years |
Weights Updating Interval | Quarterly |
Benchmark
Portfolio Description
Levered Risk Parity is likely too high-octane to hold as a total portfolio solution since this much leverage seems to create undue variance drag. However, it could be an interesting portfolio to embed as a sleeve in another portfolio. The “equal weight” construction showcases how a dynamic weighting algorithm can adapt allocation over time, allowing each asset class to leave an impact on the portfolio as a whole. Adding a risk-mitigating sleeve may be an interesting paring for this portfolio.
Policy Report
Backtest Report
From to (7y 6m 4d)
Returns (annualized)
Portfolio | 6.93% |
Benchmark | 6.67% |
Risk (annualized)
Portfolio | 20.56% |
Benchmark | 11.58% |
Sharpe (annualized)
Portfolio | 0.31 |
Benchmark | 0.41 |
Excess Return (annualized)
0.26% |
Tracking Error (annualized)
15.97% |
Information Ratio
0.02 |
Statistic | Portfolio | Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Downside Volatility | 21.98% | 12.42% |
Sortino Ratio | 0.29 | 0.38 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.15 | 0.21 |
Ulcer Index | 13.71 | 15.15 |
Max Drawdown | 42.24% | 22.16% |
VaR (99% Confidence) | $-4,780 | $-2,694 |
VaR (99.9% Confidence) | $-6,350 | $-3,578 |
Beta to Benchmark | 1.12 | N/A |
Value at Risk (VaR) is calculated off a $10,000 portfolio value.
Growth Charts
Historical Weights
Return Distribution
Excess Kurtosis
7.49 |
Skew
-0.41 |
Data Table
Factor | Portfolio | Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Duration Factor | 2.1060 | 2.1060 |
Inflation Factor | 0.6985 | 0.6985 |
Market Factor | 0.8028 | 0.8028 |
Size Factor | -0.0532 | -0.0532 |
Style Factor | 0.0789 | 0.0789 |
U.S. Tilt (Non U.S.) | -0.1994 | -0.1994 |
Yield Curve Factor | 0.3262 | 0.3262 |
Adjusted R2
Portfolio | 0.84 |
Benchmark | 0.99 |
Intercept
Portfolio | -0.00 |
Benchmark | 0.00 |