Levered Risk Parity
Portfolio Specification
Policy
Rebalancing Interval | Quarterly |
---|---|
Weights Algorithm | Equal Risk Contribution |
Weights Algorithm Look-back | 3 Years |
Weights Updating Interval | Quarterly |
Benchmark
Portfolio Description
Levered Risk Parity is likely too high-octane to hold as a total portfolio solution since this much leverage seems to create undue variance drag. However, it could be an interesting portfolio to embed as a sleeve in another portfolio. The “equal weight” construction showcases how a dynamic weighting algorithm can adapt allocation over time, allowing each asset class to leave an impact on the portfolio as a whole. Adding a risk-mitigating sleeve may be an interesting paring for this portfolio.
Policy Report
Backtest Report
From to (7y 7m 2d)
Returns (annualized)
Portfolio | 7.79% |
Benchmark | 6.97% |
Risk (annualized)
Portfolio | 20.50% |
Benchmark | 11.55% |
Sharpe (annualized)
Portfolio | 0.35 |
Benchmark | 0.43 |
Excess Return (annualized)
0.81% |
Tracking Error (annualized)
15.93% |
Information Ratio
0.05 |
Statistic | Portfolio | Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Downside Volatility | 21.91% | 12.40% |
Sortino Ratio | 0.33 | 0.40 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.17 | 0.23 |
Ulcer Index | 13.71 | 15.16 |
Max Drawdown | 42.24% | 22.16% |
VaR (99% Confidence) | $-4,768 | $-2,685 |
VaR (99.9% Confidence) | $-6,333 | $-3,567 |
Beta to Benchmark | 1.13 | N/A |
Value at Risk (VaR) is calculated off a $10,000 portfolio value.
Growth Charts
Historical Weights
Return Distribution
Excess Kurtosis
7.50 |
Skew
-0.42 |
Data Table
Factor | Portfolio | Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Duration Factor | 2.0964 | 2.0964 |
Inflation Factor | 0.6945 | 0.6945 |
Market Factor | 0.8024 | 0.8024 |
Size Factor | -0.0534 | -0.0534 |
Style Factor | 0.0771 | 0.0771 |
U.S. Tilt (Non U.S.) | -0.2084 | -0.2084 |
Yield Curve Factor | 0.3231 | 0.3231 |
Adjusted R2
Portfolio | 0.84 |
Benchmark | 0.99 |
Intercept
Portfolio | -0.00 |
Benchmark | 0.00 |