Levered Dragon
Specification
Policy
| Rebalancing Interval | Quarterly |
|---|---|
| Weights Algorithm | Equal Inverse Volatility |
| Weights Algorithm Look-back | 1 Year |
| Weights Updating Interval | Quarterly |
Benchmark
| Simple 60/40 |
Description
A leveraged interpretation of Chris Cole’s Dragon Portfolio. Since leverage access isn’t constant across asset classes, an inverse-volatility weighting algorithm is used to balance risk within the portfolio.
Policy Report
Backtest Report
From to (9y 9m 27d)
Returns (annualized)
| Portfolio | 4.65% |
| Benchmark | 6.53% |
Risk (annualized)
| Portfolio | 7.50% |
| Benchmark | 10.51% |
Sharpe (annualized)
| Portfolio | 0.41 |
| Benchmark | 0.49 |
Excess Return (annualized)
| -1.88% |
Tracking Error (annualized)
| 12.37% |
Information Ratio
| -0.15 |
| Statistic | Portfolio | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Downside Volatility | 7.81% | 11.29% |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.40 | 0.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Ulcer Index | 15.06 | 15.24 |
| Max Drawdown | 13.24% | 22.16% |
| VaR (99% Confidence) | $-1,744 | $-2,445 |
| VaR (99.9% Confidence) | $-2,317 | $-3,248 |
| Beta to Benchmark | 0.06 | N/A |
Value at Risk (VaR) is calculated off a $10,000 portfolio value.
Growth Charts
Historical Weights
Return Distribution
Excess Kurtosis
| 5.16 |
Skew
| -0.27 |
Data Table
| Factor | Portfolio | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Market Factor | 0.1347 | 0.1347 |
| Vol Factor | 0.0266 | 0.0266 |
| Vol Term Structure | 0.1228 | 0.1228 |
| Credit Factor | 0.0121 | 0.0121 |
| Duration Factor | 0.7337 | 0.7337 |
| Yield Curve Factor | 0.0721 | 0.0721 |
| Inflation Factor | 0.0772 | 0.0772 |
Adjusted R2
| Portfolio | 0.48 |
| Benchmark | 0.99 |
Intercept
| Portfolio | 0.00 |
| Benchmark | -0.00 |