Levered Dragon

Portfolio Specification

Policy

Rebalancing Interval Quarterly
Weights Algorithm Equal Inverse Volatility
Weights Algorithm Look-back 1 Year
Weights Updating Interval Quarterly

Benchmark

Simple 60/40

This portfolio is listed on the Community Portfolios page.

Portfolio Description

A leveraged interpretation of Chris Cole’s Dragon Portfolio. Since leverage access isn’t constant across asset classes, an inverse-volatility weighting algorithm is used to balance risk within the portfolio.

Policy Report

Backtest Report

From to (11y 2m 18d)

Returns (annualized)

Portfolio 5.14%
Benchmark 7.24%

Risk (annualized)

Portfolio 7.69%
Benchmark 10.50%

Sharpe (annualized)

Portfolio 0.43
Benchmark 0.53

Excess Return (annualized)

-2.09%

Tracking Error (annualized)

12.19%

Information Ratio

-0.17
Statistic Portfolio Benchmark
Downside Volatility 8.12% 11.25%
Sortino Ratio 0.41 0.49
Calmar Ratio 0.25 0.25
Ulcer Index 15.08 15.29
Max Drawdown 13.24% 22.16%
VaR (99% Confidence) $-1,789 $-2,443
VaR (99.9% Confidence) $-2,377 $-3,245
Beta to Benchmark 0.09 N/A

Value at Risk (VaR) is calculated off a $10,000 portfolio value.

Growth Charts

Historical Weights

Return Distribution

Excess Kurtosis

4.72

Skew

-0.40
Data Table
Factor Coefficients
Factor Portfolio Benchmark Excess
Market Factor 0.1588 0.5954 -0.4366
Vol Factor 0.0311 -0.0028 0.0339
Vol Term Structure 0.1259 -0.0020 0.1279
Credit Factor -0.0011 0.0775 -0.0787
Duration Factor 0.7359 0.3150 0.4209
Yield Curve Factor 0.0769 0.0088 0.0681
Inflation Factor 0.0952 0.0203 0.0748

Adjusted R2

Portfolio 0.46
Benchmark 0.99

Intercept

Portfolio 0.00
Benchmark -0.00

Factor Attribution