Levered Dragon
Portfolio Specification
Assets
Policy
Rebalancing Interval | Quarterly |
---|---|
Weights Algorithm | Equal Inverse Volatility |
Weights Algorithm Look-back | 1 Year |
Weights Updating Interval | Quarterly |
Benchmark
Portfolio Description
A leveraged interpretation of Chris Cole’s Dragon Portfolio. Since leverage access isn’t constant across asset classes, an inverse-volatility weighting algorithm is used to balance risk within the portfolio.
Policy Report
Backtest Report
From to (10y 3m 21d)
Returns (annualized)
Portfolio | 4.57% |
Benchmark | 6.49% |
Risk (annualized)
Portfolio | 7.61% |
Benchmark | 10.68% |
Sharpe (annualized)
Portfolio | 0.38 |
Benchmark | 0.47 |
Excess Return (annualized)
-1.92% |
Tracking Error (annualized)
12.40% |
Information Ratio
-0.15 |
Statistic | Portfolio | Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Downside Volatility | 7.99% | 11.43% |
Sortino Ratio | 0.36 | 0.44 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.22 | 0.23 |
Ulcer Index | 15.05 | 15.25 |
Max Drawdown | 13.24% | 22.16% |
VaR (99% Confidence) | $-1,770 | $-2,484 |
VaR (99.9% Confidence) | $-2,352 | $-3,300 |
Beta to Benchmark | 0.08 | N/A |
Value at Risk (VaR) is calculated off a $10,000 portfolio value.
Growth Charts
Historical Weights
Return Distribution
Excess Kurtosis
5.07 |
Skew
-0.35 |
Data Table
Factor | Portfolio | Benchmark |
---|---|---|
Market Factor | 0.1485 | 0.1485 |
Vol Factor | 0.0287 | 0.0287 |
Vol Term Structure | 0.1307 | 0.1307 |
Credit Factor | 0.0077 | 0.0077 |
Duration Factor | 0.7314 | 0.7314 |
Yield Curve Factor | 0.0795 | 0.0795 |
Inflation Factor | 0.0880 | 0.0880 |
Adjusted R2
Portfolio | 0.47 |
Benchmark | 0.99 |
Intercept
Portfolio | 0.00 |
Benchmark | -0.00 |